Will You Pass the Prop Firm Challenge?
Plug in your real trading stats. We run 6,000 simulated challenges against the exact rules of six prop firms — FundingPips, FundedNext, The5ers, FXIFY, OneFunded, and FTMO — and tell you which one is your best fit. Before you spend a dollar on a challenge fee, see the math.
Ready when you are
Enter your stats on the left, then hit Run 6,000 Simulations. You will see pass rates for 6 prop firms, your expected days to funded, and blowout risk — in under a second.
How this Monte Carlo simulator actually works
Most prop firm calculators just divide your profit target by your expectancy and give you a number. That is not how trading works. Real trading has variance. You can have a 60% win rate and still lose six in a row. A good simulator has to account for sequence risk, not just arithmetic.
This tool runs 1,000 independent Monte Carlo simulations for each of the six firms. Each simulation generates a random sequence of wins and losses based on your actual win rate and reward-to-risk ratio, applies the firm specific rules (daily drawdown, max drawdown type, profit target, minimum trading days), and determines whether that simulated attempt would have passed or blown out.
What each firm rules actually mean for your chances
The biggest single factor separating firms is the drawdown type. FTMO uses a static drawdown measured from your starting balance — forgiving if you run up profit early. The5ers and FundingPips use similar static models. FundedNext and FXIFY lean toward trailing drawdowns that follow your equity high-water mark — brutal for traders who build early profit then give some back. OneFunded flexible tracks sit in between.
Frequently asked questions
How accurate is the simulator?
With 1,000 simulations per firm, the margin of error on pass rate is under 2 percentage points. The accuracy of the output depends entirely on the accuracy of your inputs. Run this with real stats from at least 50 to 100 trades for a meaningful read.
Why do different firms give me such different pass rates?
Each firm enforces a unique combination of profit target, daily drawdown, max drawdown type (static vs trailing), and minimum trading days. There is no universal best firm — there is only the best firm for your stats.
Which prop firm is actually best in 2026?
The one that matches your stats. Run the simulator above and you will have a personalised answer. For a deeper comparison of rules, fees, and payout history, see our full FundedNext and FundingPips review or our dedicated The5ers review.
Why Most Prop Firm Calculators Lie To You
Before you spend $135 to $549 on a prop firm challenge, find out the math. Most prop firm calculators just divide your profit target by your expectancy and give you a number. That is not how trading works. Real trading has variance — you can have a 60% win rate and still lose six in a row.
This simulator accounts for sequence risk — the reason most challenges fail even when the math looks favourable on paper. It applies each firm’s specific profit target, daily drawdown, max drawdown type (static or trailing), minimum trading days, and consistency rules where they apply. Use it to pick the prop firm that genuinely fits your trading style, not the one with the flashiest marketing.
Which Prop Firm Is Best For Your Trading Style?
The biggest single factor separating firms is the drawdown type. FTMO uses a static drawdown measured from your starting balance — forgiving if you run up profit early. The5ers and FundingPips use similar static models. FundedNext and FXIFY lean toward trailing drawdowns that follow your equity high-water mark — brutal for traders who build early profit then give some back. OneFunded sits in between with flexible tracks.
For deeper reviews of the firms in this simulator, read our full FundedNext & FundingPips review, our dedicated The5ers review, or browse all trading tools and partner firms.