Sierra Chart is the cheapest serious order flow platform on the market, and it will punish you for the first fortnight. Almost everything else about it follows from those two facts.
It looks like software from 2004. The interface is dense, the menus are nested three deep, and nothing is where a modern platform would put it. Traders arriving from a browser tool routinely install it, open it once and never go back.
The ones who stay tend not to leave. Sierra Chart is fast, stable, extraordinarily configurable, and it gives you footprint charts, TPO profiles and full market depth for less than most competitors charge for a basic subscription. It is also one of the few platforms in this category that is honest about its own limits, including a flat refusal to sell you a lifetime licence.
This review covers what each service package actually unlocks, where the data costs sit, and the specific reasons you might be better off paying more elsewhere.
Quick Verdict: Sierra Chart
Rating: 8.4 / 10
Best for: futures traders who want professional order flow tooling at the lowest genuine cost, and anyone who values stability over aesthetics.
Not for: beginners, traders who need a polished interface, anyone unwilling to spend two weeks configuring a platform.
The package most order flow traders need: Package 11 at $46 a month, not Package 12.
What Is Sierra Chart?
Sierra Chart is a Windows charting, analysis and trade execution platform aimed squarely at futures traders. It has been around for a long time, it is developed by a small team, and it has a reputation for two things: performance and bluntness.
The performance is real. It is a native application, not a browser wrapper, and it handles full market depth on multiple instruments on hardware that would bring heavier platforms to a stop. Traders who run tick charts with depth histories tend to end up here for exactly that reason.
The bluntness shows up in the documentation and the support board, where the answer to “can you make this easier” is usually no, with a link to the relevant page. That is not for everyone. It does mean the documentation is unusually complete.
Sierra Chart Pricing: Which Package You Actually Need
This is where most people get confused, because the package numbers are not sequential in any intuitive way and the names do not tell you the important thing.
The important thing is the split between Base and Integrated.
Base packages run Sierra Chart on its own data and simulated trading services. They will not connect to Interactive Brokers, CQG or Rithmic, and they cannot use Sierra Chart’s own Denali Exchange Data Feed.
Integrated packages open external connectivity to supported data and trading services, and to Denali.
- Package 3 – Base Standard, $26 a month. The full software except the advanced studies.
- Package 5 – Base with Advanced Features, $36 a month. Adds TPO charts, Numbers Bars and the Market Depth Historical Graph, but still no external connectivity.
- Package 10 – Integrated Standard, $36 a month. External connectivity, standard studies.
- Package 11 – Integrated with Advanced Features, $46 a month. External connectivity plus TPO, Numbers Bars and the depth graph.
- Package 12 – Integrated, Advanced, plus Market by Order, $56 a month. Adds market–by–order data.
Which package do you actually need?
For almost every futures trader reading this, the answer is Package 11.
Numbers Bars is Sierra Chart’s footprint chart, and it is the tool most order flow traders come here for. It sits behind the Advanced Features line, which means Package 5 or Package 11. Since Package 5 cannot connect to a broker or to Denali, and you will need one or both, Package 11 is the realistic entry point at $46 a month.
Package 12 adds market by order, which tracks individual orders in the book rather than aggregate size at each level. It is the same class of information Bookmap’s heatmap is built on. If you are trading absorption and want to see individual orders queue and pull, it earns the extra $10. If you are reading footprint and profile, it does not.
Package 3 at $26 is a legitimate cheap entry for someone charting on Sierra Chart’s included data while trading elsewhere, but it is a narrower use case than the price suggests.
The discount nobody reads about
Sierra Chart discounts prepayment steeply: 15% for three months, 25% for six, and 35% for twelve.
That last tier is the interesting one. Package 11 prepaid for a year is $358.80, which works out at $29.90 a month. Package 12 comes down to $36.40. You are getting the advanced order flow tier for less than most platforms charge for basic charting.
Against that, Sierra Chart states plainly that it will never offer a one–time purchase option, and gives its reasoning: the subscription covers data services, order routing and continuous updates, not just software. Whatever you think of that, it is at least stated openly rather than buried.
The cost that actually matters
The subscription is the small number. Exchange data is the real one.
Sierra Chart’s own Denali Exchange Data Feed provides real–time futures, stocks and cash index data covering CME, CBOT, NYMEX, COMEX, EUREX, CFE, NASDAQ TotalView, the US equities consolidated tape and CBOE indices. It runs up to 1,400 levels of market depth per side, supports three simultaneous connections per device, and requires Package 10, 11 or 12.
Exchange fees are charged on top, and this is where prop firm traders need to pay attention. To qualify for non–professional CME Group rates, Sierra Chart requires you to connect to a live, funded futures trading account at least once a month for verification. If you do not hold a qualifying live funded account, professional exchange rates apply instead, and professional rates are a different order of magnitude.
If you are trading a prop firm evaluation rather than a funded personal account, check this before you budget. It is the single most common unpleasant surprise in Sierra Chart’s pricing.
Key Features That Actually Matter
Numbers Bars
Sierra Chart’s footprint implementation, and the reason most order flow traders are here. It displays bid and ask volume at each price level within a bar, with a deep set of calculated values below each bar that you can configure to an unusual degree.
Unlike a footprint derived from intrabar price direction, this is built on actual bid and ask volume where the feed provides it. For anyone working the concepts in our order flow guide, that distinction is the whole point of paying for a specialist platform.
TPO charts and volume profile
The TPO study is a full market profile implementation, and the volume profile drawing tool is now available on every package rather than being gated behind the advanced tier. If you work from value areas and points of control, the approach we cover in our volume profile guide, this is a strong and cheap home for it.
Market depth and the depth historical graph
The Market Depth Historical Graph renders resting liquidity over time, which is the same category of information Bookmap built a business on. It is less polished than a dedicated heatmap and it is included in a $46 package rather than a $99 one.
Included data and simulated trading
Every package includes the historical data service, a real–time forex and CFD feed, market statistics, crypto data, a delayed exchange feed that carries depth and market–by–order data, and unlimited server–based simulated trading.
That delayed feed deserves a mention. You can learn the platform properly, including depth and MBO tooling, before paying a cent in exchange fees. Very few platforms let you do that.
Performance and stability
The recurring theme in user reports is that it does not fall over. Charts stay responsive during volatile opens, depth data keeps rendering, and the application does not consume a machine the way heavier platforms do. For a trader executing from the chart during a news release, this matters more than any feature list.
Custom studies
Studies and systems are written in C++, with a large ecosystem of third–party work and an ACSIL interface that gives you genuine low–level control. This is more demanding than Pine Script and considerably more capable.
What Sierra Chart Gets Wrong
The interface is genuinely bad
Not old–fashioned. Bad. Settings are scattered across nested dialogs, defaults are unhelpful, and finding a specific option often means searching the documentation rather than the menus. Budget a fortnight before you are comfortable, and expect to spend part of it importing someone else’s configuration.
The package structure is unnecessarily confusing
Five packages, numbered 3, 5, 10, 11 and 12, split across two categories, with two of them priced identically at $36 for different reasons. Nothing about the naming tells a new user that Package 5 cannot connect to their broker. Traders buy the wrong package regularly.
Windows only, in practice
Sierra Chart is a Windows application. Mac and Linux users run it through Wine or a virtual machine, which works for many people and is not supported in any meaningful sense. If you are on a Mac and want an easy life, this is not your platform.
Support is correct rather than warm
The support board is fast, accurate and staffed by people who built the software. It is also blunt to the point of abrasive, and the standard answer to a poorly researched question is a link. If you want hand–holding, you will not enjoy it.
No mobile, no browser, no cloud
There is no mobile app and no browser version. Your charts live on one machine. For a trader who monitors from a phone, that is a genuine gap, and the usual answer is to run TradingView alongside it for exactly that.
Sierra Chart vs the Alternatives
Sierra Chart vs ATAS
ATAS is the more approachable platform by a wide margin: better interface, gentler onboarding, strong footprint and tape tooling out of the box. Sierra Chart is cheaper, faster and more configurable, and asks considerably more of you before it becomes useful.
If your time is worth more than the difference in subscription cost, ATAS. If you are prepared to invest the setup time and want the lowest ongoing cost with the deepest customisation, Sierra Chart.
Sierra Chart vs NinjaTrader
NinjaTrader gives you a brokerage, C# automation, wider prop firm support and a much easier start. Sierra Chart gives you better performance, cheaper access to advanced order flow studies, and market by order at $56 a month.
NinjaTrader if you want one integrated product and possibly your prop firm requires it. Sierra Chart if you want the analysis engine and will bring your own broker.
Sierra Chart vs Bookmap
Bookmap does one thing better: the liquidity heatmap is more legible and more refined than Sierra Chart’s depth graph. Sierra Chart does far more overall for less money, with market–by–order data at $56 a month against Bookmap’s top tier at $99 before data.
Traders who want the heatmap specifically buy Bookmap. Traders who want a complete platform that also shows depth history buy Sierra Chart.
Who Should Use Sierra Chart
- Futures traders who want professional order flow tooling at the lowest genuine monthly cost
- Traders running multiple instruments with full depth on modest hardware
- Anyone who values stability and speed over interface polish
- C++ developers who want low–level control over custom studies
- Traders already holding a live funded futures account, who qualify for non–professional data rates
Who Should NOT Use Sierra Chart
- Beginners – the learning curve will cost you more than the subscription saves
- Mac users who are not prepared to run a virtual machine
- Traders who need mobile or browser access to their charts
- Anyone whose main market is equities or forex rather than futures
- Prop firm evaluation traders who have not checked whether they qualify for non–professional data rates
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does Sierra Chart cost?
Service packages run from $26 a month for Package 3 to $56 a month for Package 12. Most order flow traders need Package 11 at $46. Prepaying cuts that substantially: 35% off for twelve months brings Package 11 to $29.90 a month. Exchange data fees are charged separately on top.
Which Sierra Chart package do I need?
Package 11 for most futures traders. It is the cheapest package that combines external broker connectivity with the advanced studies, including Numbers Bars. Choose Package 12 only if you specifically need market–by–order data. Avoid Package 5 unless you are certain you will never connect to an external broker or data service.
Does Sierra Chart have footprint charts?
Yes. Numbers Bars is Sierra Chart’s footprint study, available on the advanced packages, 5 and 11 upwards. It is built on genuine bid and ask volume where the data feed supplies it, rather than inferred from price movement, which is the meaningful difference against general charting platforms.
Is Sierra Chart good for beginners?
No. It is powerful and cheap, and the interface will fight you for weeks. A new trader is better served learning on something forgiving and moving here once they know what they need. Our futures trading guide is a better place to start.
Does Sierra Chart work on Mac?
Not natively. It is a Windows application. Mac and Linux users run it through Wine or a virtual machine. That works for many traders, and it is not officially supported, so troubleshooting is on you.
What is the Denali Exchange Data Feed?
Sierra Chart’s own real–time data feed, covering CME, CBOT, NYMEX, COMEX, EUREX, CFE, NASDAQ TotalView, the US equities consolidated tape and CBOE indices, with up to 1,400 levels of depth per side. It requires an Integrated package, 10, 11 or 12, and exchange fees are charged on top.
Can I buy Sierra Chart outright?
No. Sierra Chart states explicitly that it does not offer a one–time purchase and never will, on the basis that the fee covers data, order routing and ongoing development rather than software alone. The twelve–month prepayment at 35% off is the closest thing available.
Do prop firms support Sierra Chart?
Many futures firms do, though platform lists change and you should confirm with your firm directly. The more important question is data classification: non–professional CME rates require a live funded futures account, which an evaluation account may not satisfy. Check before you commit. Our prop firm trading guide covers how evaluations work.
What are the best alternatives to Sierra Chart?
ATAS for a far more approachable order flow platform. Quantower for multi–broker execution with a modern interface. NinjaTrader for integrated brokerage and C# automation. See our trading tools guide for the wider stack.
Final Verdict
Sierra Chart is the best value in serious order flow software, and value is not the same as best.
What you are buying at $46 a month, or under $30 prepaid annually, is a fast, stable, deeply configurable futures platform with a real footprint study, TPO profiles and depth history. Nothing else in this review delivers that combination at that price.
What you are paying instead of money is time. Two weeks of configuration, a documentation habit, and the acceptance that the interface is never going to get better. Traders who make that trade willingly rarely regret it. Traders who expected software to be pleasant abandon it in the first week and are right to.
If you already know what a footprint chart is and why you want one, this is the cheapest honest way to get it. If you are still working that out, start somewhere gentler and come back when the price difference matters more than the learning curve.
→ Related: ATAS Review · Order Flow Trading Guide · Volume Profile Trading
The Complete Trader's Edge
The full Mind · Method · Money framework. 70 chapters.
View on Amazon →
Market Mayhem
400 years of bubbles, crashes, and the pattern that keeps repeating.
Buy on Amazon →
Greatest Companies
How the world's greatest companies were built — and what traders learn from them.
View on Amazon →
Greatest Traders
Eighty-six lives that explain the markets — Livermore to Madoff, told with the losses left in.
View on Amazon →




